Conspiracy Theories or Conspiracies?
I am not a doctor, scientist, or expert in anything. This content should not be construed as advice or recommendation, but is intended for entertainment and informational purposes only.
Who doesn’t love a good movie or book, assuming anyone reads anymore, about a conspiracy? The plot line typically involves some fringe member of society, or a “normal” person (or both) who mistakenly uncovers a conspiracy amongst some combination of elements in government (usually Republicans/conservatives of course), business, intelligence agencies, criminal organizations, and/or media, and gets sucked into a high stakes race to end or expose said conspiracy.
While most people cheer for the outcast character against the bad guys, real life could not be more different. In reality, we want to fit in to “normal” society so we cheer for and defer to those in positions of power who set the narrative that normal society is supposed to follow. Our minds dare not entertain the possibility that those we worship could resemble the fictional bad guys, unless they play for the other team.
To espouse a conspiracy theory or even suggest that a conspiracy theory may have some element of truth puts a target on one’s back and risks a person’s place in normal society. A person who subscribes to a conspiracy theory is an outcast, a paranoid kook, off his or her rocker.
Depending on the subject matter, it seems that our political stripes will color how we view those who levy an accusation of conspiracy. In most mainstream media and left leaning political circles, people who subscribe to conspiracy theories are often labeled as ultra-conservative, alt-right, anti-vax, mouth breathing, racist, sexist, transphobic, xenophobic, QAnon, bible thumping nut jobs.
Conversely, any conspiracy accusation made by those on the left means it must be true. For example, remember when Democrats howled that George W. Bush stole the election from Al Gore by rigging voting machines, and when Trump, with Russia’s help, stole the election from Hillary. Yet when Biden was accused of the same thing it couldn’t possibly be true according to those on the left.
When Bush and Trump supposedly stole the election, those on the right thought the Dems were a bunch of whiny, sore losers. When blowhard Trump, who still thinks that the failed COVID gene therapies are one of his greatest accomplishments, lost to the senile old man currently in charge of our nukes the right was ready to revolt.
I’ve stated many times in these posts that both parties suck royally so I’m not trying to fan the flames of some political battle. In fact, I’m asking, and this is a huge ask, for you to stop identifying with your current political team, and just look at what I’m going to cover objectively.
I realize how difficult this will be for most people. We wrap so much of our identity into belonging to a particular tribe that we willfully ignore evidence in plain sight in order to retain our identity and fit in with our group. Or we justify questionable and even outright criminal behavior with the lesser of two evils argument.
But if we are to stand a chance of not letting this country and our freedom go down the tubes, we have to take a step back and let go of our preconceived notions, as well as, our fear of being labeled an outcast to look at the bigger picture.
I think another big reason why it’s such a struggle for us to accept that many conspiracy theories are true is that we have a misperception of how they work. Many of us picture a bond villain, for example Klaus Schwab of the WEF (pic below), at the head of a conference table filled with shadowy underlords from around the world. Just look at how this fucking guy dresses. It’s like Tom Cruise at a Scientology event.
This bond villain type is pulling all of the strings of an elaborately connected web of interests to enrich and empower himself and his minions. While that could be how some conspiracies work and Klauss certainly fits the role, I think that the real way most conspiracies operate is much less fantastical.
The simple matter is that people whose interests happen to align find each other, and fill a need that allows each person or group to accomplish his or its respective goals. These people often believe they are doing the right thing although that right thing may not be in humanity’s best interests regardless of how it’s portrayed.
For example, Adolf Hitler, started his political career by targeting Communists. And why not go after the Commies, right? Good riddance.
But then he started getting a little more, ahem, extreme. He believed that by exterminating the physically and mentally disabled, the infirm elderly, and those with incurable diseases he was doing the world a favor by eliminating those maladies. And maybe (this is a stretch) he believed he was being merciful to the people he was putting out of misery. Obviously this list grew to include Jews, Gypsies, Christians, perceived enemies of the Nazi regime, and anyone else they didn’t like or who sympathized with people on the bad apple list.
Of course, he wasn’t the only one carrying out this agenda. Wacko doctors now had plenty of subjects for some pretty nasty experimentation that involved chemicals produced by major pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturers who were curious how their products would affect people. This was all done in secret although people in Germany likely heard rumors, but probably dismissed them as just crazy conspiracy theories.
Hitler would call it wins all the way around since they were advancing science, being merciful to the disabled, and cleaning up the blood lines along the way. It’s too horrifying to even comprehend, right? And surely this type of stuff doesn’t go on today.
Pharmaceutical companies wouldn’t think of doing shoddy experiments with their experimental concoctions on unsuspecting women and children in some far away place like Africa where a small amount of money can grease the right palms so government officials look the other way, and where western mainstream media is nowhere to be found. Right?
Could it be that we cheer for the protagonist in the movie or book who is trying to expose the conspiracy because deep down we’re pretty sure that a lot of conspiracy theories are in fact true, and the people in charge are just as bad as the ones in the movies?
According to Dictionary.com, a conspiracy is defined as:
the act of conspiring.
an unlawful, harmful, or evil plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
a combination of persons for such an unlawful, harmful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.
Wikipedia gives us the following explanation:
A conspiracy, also known as a plot, is a secret plan or agreement between people (called conspirers or conspirators) for an unlawful or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason, especially with political motivation,[1] while keeping their agreement secret from the public or from other people affected by it. In a political sense, conspiracy refers to a group of people united in the goal of usurping, altering or overthrowing an established political power. Depending on the circumstances, a conspiracy may also be a crime, or a civil wrong.[2] The term generally implies wrongdoing or illegality on the part of the conspirators, as people would not need to conspire to engage in activities that were lawful and ethical, or to which no one would object.
According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, a theory is defined as:
1 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
the wave theory of light
2 a: a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action
her method is based on the theory that all children want to learn
b: an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances
—often used in the phrase in theory
in theory, we have always advocated freedom for all
3 a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation
b : an unproved assumption : CONJECTURE
c : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject
theory of equations
4 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art
music theory
5 : abstract thought : SPECULATION
6 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
Based on these definitions, if two or more people are involved in some sort of secret plot, it’s a conspiracy theory, thus, there are only competing conspiracy theories.
For example, the government’s version of 9/11 is based on a very hasty and shallow investigation that claims a handful of terrorists who could barely fly single engine Cessnas were funded solely by Osama Bin Laden, and managed to evade the most sophisticated intelligence agencies for months or years eventually hijacking four commercial passenger planes two of which were flown into the twin towers causing them to collapse, one into the Pentagon on the side of the building that was under construction, and one was crashed into a field as heroic passengers fought to gain control of the plane.
This is the official conspiracy theory. An alternative, or competing, conspiracy theory would be anything other than the official narrative.
Since the government’s official version of the JFK assassination is that a lone gunman managed to do the deed without involving anyone else, it cannot be a conspiracy thus no official conspiracy theory.
With that out of the way, let’s look at some examples of conspiracy theories that may or may not be actual conspiracies.
SARS-CoV-2 LAB LEAK ORIGIN
Tony Fauci, now former director of the NAIAD, and a group of researchers were hell bent early on to frame the origins of SARS-CoV-2 as natural transmission from some as of yet unidentified animal to a human that set off the great COVID plandemic. These researchers quickly published their Proximal Origins hypothesis in Nature on March 17, 2020 just as the world was going into mandated lockdowns.
However, emails between Fauci and these researchers indicate that these same researchers believed that the virus appeared to have been genetically altered in a lab. Instead of offering the possibility of a lab origin though, these researchers presented a united front on a animal to human transmission scenario. Why?
Well, these researchers receive a lot of grant money from the NAIAD. In fact, Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance who was not an author of the Proximal Origins paper had actually received NAIAD grant money that was funneled to The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory, just a few miles from the market where the SARS-CoV-2 virus supposedly emerged. This money went to support gain of function research on bat coronaviruses so we could develop vaccines to be prepared when a pandemic emerged.
Somehow this asshole got himself on the WHO investigative team that went to Wuhan and did no investigation to speak of.
These researchers were ultimately rewarded with nice juicy grants from the NAIAD for trying to divert attention away from a lab leak origin. To suggest that the origin of the virus was a Chinese lab was somehow deemed by mainstream media to be a racist and xenophobic conspiracy theory.
Fast forward a couple of years, and now it’s becoming more evident, if it wasn’t already, that the geniuses who are doing research trying to make germs more deadly and transmissible in order to protect us from them if they ever happen to emerge from an animal source got the cart ahead of the proverbial horse.
The FBI as well as the Department of Energy place a greater likelihood that the virus had lab origins. Maybe it didn’t come from the Wuhan lab, but perhaps from one of the Ukrainian labs we funded? You know, the ones that Secretary Nuland was worried would fall into Russian hands, but hey no biological weapons are being made there (wink, wink) so it’s a big deal but not a big deal.
It’s unlikely we will ever find smoking gun evidence at this point, but I would be vastly more surprised if this virus originated in an animal instead of a lab. I also suspect that the virus somehow escaped the lab and was not intentionally released. Regardless of how it happened, these egotistical idiots are playing with fire.
TRUMP/RUSSIA COLLUSION
Everybody knows that Trump colluded with Putin to win the 2016 presidential election defeating shoe in globalist Hillary Clinton. To the left, this conspiracy theory was as true as the sun’s existence in the sky. For four years, mainstream media and the political left drove themselves to near hysteria about how Trump stole the election with Russia’s help, and Robert Mueller, former director of the FBI, was brought on as special counsel to investigate.
The only problem was the whole story was bullshit. Not only did Mueller find no evidence of collusion, the recently released Durham Report shows that the FBI had ZERO credible evidence to even open an investigation. The report also notes that the FBI had ignored significant intelligence and questionable actions of the Clinton campaign and that Obama had been made aware. Per the Durham Report (emphasis mine):
The speed and manner in which the FBI opened and investigated Crossfire Hurricane during the presidential election season based on raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence also reflected a noticeable departure from how it approached prior matters involving possible attempted foreign election interference plans aimed at the Clinton campaign. As described in Section IV.B, in the eighteen months leading up to the 2016 election, the FBI was required to deal with a number of proposed investigations that had the potential of affecting the election.
In each of those instances, the FBI moved with considerable caution. In one such matter discussed in Section IV.B.l, FBI Headquarters and Department officials required defensive briefings to be provided to Clinton and other officials or candidates who appeared to be the targets of foreign interference. In another, the FBI elected to end an investigation after one of its longtime and valuable CHSs went beyond what was authorized and made an improper and possibly illegal financial contribution to the Clinton campaign on behalf of a foreign entity as a precursor to a much larger donation being contemplated. And in a third, the Clinton Foundation matter, both senior FBI and Department officials placed restrictions on how those matters were to be handled such that essentially no investigative activities occurred for months leading up to the election. These examples are also markedly different from the FBI' s actions with respect to other highly significant intelligence it received from a trusted foreign source pointing to a Clinton campaign plan to vilify Trump by tying him to Vladimir Putin so as to divert attention from her own concerns relating to her use of a private email server.
Unlike the FBI's opening of a full investigation of unknown members of the Trump campaign based on raw, uncorroborated information, in this separate matter involving a purported Clinton campaign plan, the FBI never opened any type of inquiry, issued any taskings, employed any analytical personnel, or produced any analytical products in connection with the information. This lack of action was despite the fact that the significance of the Clinton plan intelligence was such as to have prompted the Director ofthe CIA to brief the President, Vice President, Attorney General, Director of the FBI, and other senior government officials about its content within days of its receipt. It was also of enough importance for the CIA to send a formal written referral memorandum to Director Corney and the Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, Peter Strzok, for their consideration and action. 25 The investigative referral provided examples of information the Crossfire Hurricane fusion cell had "gleaned to date."26
Make no mistake, I am no fan of Trump. I did not vote for him and I wouldn’t for him, but there appears to be two sets of rules and that’s where I start to have a problem. There are rules for those favored sons and daughters entrenched within the deep state like the Clintons who’ve left a long trail of dirt and dead bodies in their wake. Then you have rules for the Trumps or anyone else who might threaten the power structure of the DC beast.
HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP
In the run-up to the 2020 election, a story sprang up in the New York Post about a laptop reportedly belonging to Hunter Biden that had been left in a computer repair shop. Apparently the owner of the shop contacted the FBI because of disturbing content he discovered on the laptop.
Mainstream media and social media quickly rushed to squash the story and claimed Russian meddling while offering no proof. The intelligence community got in on the act with 51 ex-intelligence officers including the former CIA Director and the former Director of National Intelligence signing a letter discrediting the content of the laptop stating that it was likely Russian disinformation. The FBI stood down so as not to interfere with the election.
Unlike the Russiagate Collusion hoax, the laptop was the real deal and it appears that the media, the FBI, the intelligence community, and the Democratic party colluded to minimize the damage to Biden prior to the election. Ironically, this would be election interference.
Because the contents of the laptop are detrimental to the Democratic party, the majority of mainstream media has largely ignored the story around the Biden family corruption contained in the laptop because it’s just not interesting enough for them to cover.
GOVERNMENT/SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP
During the COVID plandemic, many highly regarded doctors and scientists regularly found their Twitter, Fakebook, and YouTube accounts frozen and/or their posts removed or in some way fact checked and flagged as misleading or potential mis- or dis-information. Obviously this was happening at a time of great confusion when all voices should have been heard not selectively silenced.
Hitler’s greatest tool in his rise to power was his incredible ability to use emotionally charged propaganda to control the narrative, and even more importantly, silence dissenting voices.
Continued in Part 2.