Fluoride Linked To Lower IQ - EPA Ordered To Regulate Fluoride In Drinking Water

Everybody knows that vaccines and water fluoridation are two of the modern marvels that have improved the public’s health in the last century.

Except we know that vaccines didn’t arrive on the scene until long after communicable diseases had been on the decline, and death rates had nearly hit the zero bound. We also know that the safety of vaccines is questionable since they have never been tested for safety.

But surely water fluoridation is safe and effective, right?

Well, as has so often been the case with our modern technological marvels, it appears that water fluoridation may not be the panacea of health as it was sold to the public.

The fight over water fluoridation has been going on almost from the beginning of this highly questionable practice. A lawsuit against the EPA that has been in the works since 2017 finally resulted a federal judge ruling that the EPA must regulate fluoride in water due to the potential neurological effects of water fluoridation on children.

The EPA had been doing its best to avoid addressing water fluoridation, and claimed to be waiting on results from the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to present its findings ignoring all of the evidence that has been provided by independent researchers.

Well, the NTP presented it’s findings and 64 of the 72 studies found an inverse correlation between fluoride exposure and IQ in children. Fluoride, which is also used in many medications (including Prozac & other SSRIs), dental products, pesticides, and even chemicals used on clothes and upholstery, can cause dental and skeletal fluorosis, joint pain, kidney damage, and affect the thyroid.

Fluoride is a mineral that is supposed to help prevent tooth decay, and may help with the repair of enamel. Maybe you have received a fluoride gel treatment at your dentist’s office. Why don’t they just give you a fluoride pill instead of making you sit their with the mouthpieces full of gel or just drink a bunch of tap water?

Well, fluoride really only works in topical applications, and must be in contact with teeth for several minutes to have any impact. It is also not intended to be ingested. If you use fluoride containing toothpaste, read the drug label on the tube. For example, Crest Cavity Protection Toothpaste states the following:

There is very little data regarding the impact of water fluoridation on tooth decay. Water Fluoridation and Dental Caries in U.S. Children and Adolescents originally published the Journal of Dental Research compared counties that with greater than 75% of the communities being fluoridated vs counties which had fewer than 75% of the communities being fluoridated.

The authors found a 30% reduction in dental caries for children between the ages of 2-8 years old in counties with equal or greater than 75% fluoridation, but only saw a 12% reduction in dental caries for 6-17 year olds vs counties with less than 75% fluoridation.

30% sounds impressive, until you look at what it really means. 2-8 year olds in the 75% or greater counties still had an average of 3.3 dental caries vs 4.6 dental caries in the same age group in the less than 75% counties.

In the 6-17 year olds, you had an average of 1.9 dental caries in the 75% or greater cohort compared to 2.2 dental caries in the less than 75% group.

Does preventing 1 or fewer cavities for the average child justify the mass drugging of the entire population? And how do we know that water fluoridation was the reason for the reduction in the number of cavities? There are a great many reasons that one could see variation in cavities between different communities.

A very simple reason could be that the cohort that is less than 75% fluoridated is only 3/4 the size of the 75%+ group. Having the same number of people in both groups with say 5 or 6 cavities will skew the less than 75% group’s average higher than the 75%+ group.

Why not also compare the median number of cavities? Or perhaps control for certain factors and compare like sized groups?

This study simply demonstrates a correlation, and as the conventional medical authoritarians like to tell us regarding vaccines and injury and death, correlation does not prove causation. This is lazy “science” and looks more like an attempt to not find something they don’t want to find.

So if you live in a community that has fluoridated water, you are being drugged without your informed consent with a compound that was never meant to be ingested.

But it’s actually worse than that.

The type of fluoride that is typically added to water supplies is not a naturally occurring form of fluoride, nor of the pharmaceutical grade fluoride compounds that are used in your fluoride gels and toothpastes.

Instead, fluorosilicic acid, aka hexafluorosilicic acid, is actually a waste product from the fertilizer industry. It’s a toxic and corrosive product that is also used in lead refining, rust removal products, and concrete treatments.

So not only are you being drugged without your consent with a product that was never meant to be ingested, you are being drugged with a waste product.

I’d love to hear again how our government is looking out for us, and is full of benevolent people.

While it’s all good and well that the this ruling has occurred, no timeline to either remove fluoride from water, or mitigate it’s effects on neurological impacts has been established.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to remove fluoride from your water with most filtration products. The most reliable way to remove fluoride is by utilizing reverse osmosis systems. But we shouldn’t have to go to those lengths to remove something that shouldn’t be there in the first place.

YOU and I are critical to getting this shit out of our water supplies. If you don’t want to keep receiving this involuntary medical treatment that doesn’t likely do anything to improve oral health and probably contributes to poorer overall health, we must contact our municipal water authorities, and demand they take action to remove this poison from our water supply. That’s the only way this is going to be accomplished in our lifetimes.

Here is a link to the ruling which you can send to your water municipality: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egpbozdqkvq/09252024fluoride.pdf

To make it easy, consider using the following boiler plate to communicate with your municipality:

What is the plan to discontinue the practice of adding fluoride chemicals that have no reliable evidence of preventing tooth decay to our water supply in light of the recent judgment against the EPA ordering them to mitigate the neurological effects of fluoride added to water?