WHO Pandemic Treaty a Threat to Your Sovereignty
The treaty that the World Health Organization (WHO) refuses to call a treaty is on the precipice of being signed into existence. Regardless of the name by which this treaty is identified, the implications to the sovereignty of the citizens of this and every other country participating is at stake.
This may sound like hyperbole, but I assure you it is not. The groundwork for this legally binding agreement that definitely isn’t a treaty has been in the works for decades, long before the COVID plandemic.
If your main source of news is legacy media outlets, it’s very likely that you have not heard much about this world altering development, but that does not minimize the gravity of the situation.
If you haven’t figured it out by now, the reason why you don’t hear much about things like this from legacy media outlets, at least here in the U.S., is because the media is owned by companies (a la Pfizer and buddies) that stand to benefit greatly from such a treaty.
The big reason that this agreement is not called a treaty is because it will not require Senate approval which is part of the treaty ratification process here in the U.S. The Biden administration can sign this treaty agreement without any input from representatives who were elected by the citizens who will be impacted by it.
You may be thinking, “So what?” If you are one of the ninnies who think we actually experienced a real life pandemic and Trump fumbled the efforts to contain it, you probably would welcome an international body that will tell you exactly how to stay safe and protect yourself regardless of whether any of the measures work or how much they invade your personal rights.
I can assure you these measures will include more lockdowns by which more freedom and personal property will be taken, as well as, experimental shots that won’t work but will make for built in business for global pharma companies.
No doubt, there are some at the WHO and other governmental bodies who are pushing this treaty because they actually believe that pathogen X is right around the corner and we must centralize efforts to combat it. COVID wouldn’t have been such a problem if only the WHO had more power they reason.
But others just recognize the amazing opportunity that is presented by scaring people into believing we are all one sneeze away from mass death and will gratefully bend the knee to some shadowy global entity that effectively becomes a one world government under the auspices of saving human kind.
You can read the full Zero Draft document here. I would strongly encourage you to read the full document and pay very close attention to how it is written. Relatively benign language is used making it seem like a perfectly reasonable treaty agreement that does not usurp sovereignty.
But read closer and you notice the contradictions to that premise. Make no mistake, this is nothing other than a play for control over every person on this planet under the guise of preventing and controlling pandemics. What could possibly go wrong with an all powerful centralized one world governmental entity?
Oh, and those who identify with anything Woke will be pleased to know that ensuring equity in responding to these future pandemics is key. It’s more important that we have equitable representation of sex (plus all of the Rainbow crowd) and color in the response efforts than having the best and brightest on the job.
15. Reaffirming the importance of diverse, gender-balanced and equitable representation and expertise in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and health system recovery decision-making, as well as in the design and implementation of activities,
They also assure us that disease primarily originates in animals and spills over to humans (who happen to be animals too.)
23. Understanding that most emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, including wildlife and domesticated animals, then spill over to people,
No pathogen that’s been tinkered with in labs has escaped and caused any problems. No sir, just those dirty animal vectors.
Therefore, more research and development is needed to make vaccines for pathogens we created in a labs just in case they manage to evolve exactly the same way in animals.
47. Recognizing that publicly funded research and development plays an important role in the development of pandemic-related products and, as such, requires conditionalities,
48. Underscoring the importance of promoting early, safe, transparent and rapid sharing of samples and genetic sequence data of pathogens, as well as the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising therefrom, taking into account relevant national and international laws, regulations, obligations and frameworks, including the International Health Regulations, the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization, and the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework, and also mindful of the work being undertaken in other relevant areas and by other United Nations and multilateral organizations or agencies,
They also want to create a new 4-part entity that governs health, food, agriculture, livestock and environment:
27. Acknowledging the creation of the Quadripartite (WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health and the United Nations Environment Programme) to better address any One Health-related issue,
Under Article 3, we find that states retain sovereignty:
3. Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their biological resources.
However, a few points down we find that sovereignty is granted until it isn’t:
8. Common but differentiated responsibilities and capabilities in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems – All States are responsible for the health of their people, including pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery, and previous pandemics have demonstrated that no one is safe until everyone is safe. Given that the health of all peoples is dependent on the fullest cooperation of individuals and States, all Parties are bound by the obligations of the WHO CA+. States that hold more resources relevant to pandemics, including pandemic-related products and manufacturing capacity, should bear, where appropriate, a commensurate degree of differentiated responsibility with regard to global pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. With the aim of supporting every Party to achieve the highest level of proven and sustained capacity, full consideration and prioritization are required of the specific needs and special circumstances of developing country Parties, especially those that (i) are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects of pandemics; (ii) do not have adequate capacities to respond to pandemics; and (iii) potentially bear a disproportionately high burden.
Point 15 of Article 3 tells us that we will have universal health coverage. Move over Obamacare, we’re about to have something even more expensive and worthless.
Point 17 of Article 3 informs us that the WHO will be the governing authority on global health.
In Article 6, we learn that there will be a centralized Global Pandemic Supply Chain and Logistics Network run by the WHO.
Article 8 calls for the strengthening of national regulatory agencies. Because these agencies performed so well with COVID, they need even more power to cram more poorly tested and ineffective products down our throats.
Hopefully by now you’ve decided to read the full document for yourself, and come to realize that this is an incredibly dangerous move for your personal freedom and liberty. It’s time to make some noise, and let others know this will be the law of the land unless we push back. Will you sit back and let it happen, or will you stand up for your freedom?